Doctor Of Osteopathic Medicine: A Growing Share Of The Physician Workforce

Doctors of osteopathic medicine currently make up about 8.5 percent of licensed physicians, but that percentage will increase in the coming years.

from Health Affairs

Doctors of osteopathic medicine have been around since the late-1800s but are gaining increasing attention due to their recent dramatic growth. While doctor of osteopathic medicine training was originally more focused on spinal manipulation, today it is very similar to the training for medical doctors and accepted as equivalent by state licensing agencies and most residency programs. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) have teamed up to establish a single accreditation system for all graduate medical education (residency) programs. By 2020, the single accreditation system will further narrow the distinction between medical doctors and doctors of osteopathic medicine as all residents and fellows will have to meet the same training standards.

Read More →

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

Why Patients Seek Naturopathic Doctors

by Jennifer Landis

Medicine is usually fairly straightforward — patients who are feeling ill seek out the advice of a primary-care doctor — but more and more patients are choosing to look for a naturopathic doctor instead of relying on traditional medicine. Why are patients choosing naturopathy over primary care?

What Is Naturopathic Medicine?

First, naturopathic medicine is a growing form of primary care that relies on natural therapies instead of traditional medications. It does much of what primary care is designed to do — preventive medicine, treatment and working toward a state of optimal health — while helping patients make lifestyle changes and use natural, and sometimes centuries-old, medical knowledge.

There are currently more than 4,300 licensed naturopathic doctors in the United States. To become licensed as a naturopathic doctor, individuals are required to graduate from an accredited naturopathic medical school after a four-year program. There are currently only 17 states, plus the District of Columbia, that have laws on the books that regulate licensing. Naturopathic doctors are also able to ply their trade in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Why are patients choosing to seek out these naturopathic doctors for their primary care?

Patients Are Seeking Customized Treatment

Traditional medical treatments run the risk of being “cookie-cutter” medicine — for example, a doctor who treats chronic pain will probably recommend the same drugs and course of treatment for each patient. It’s difficult, if not impossible, for a patient to convince their primary-care doctor to work with them to create a personalized treatment plan that works best for them.

Patients seeking have turned to naturopathic doctors to receive a more tailored approach to medicine. With a naturopathic treatment plan, you can’t prescribe the same thing for multiple patients. The treatment that works best for one patient might not work at all for the next. Part of what makes becoming a naturopathic doctor so difficult is that you have to know the basics of medicine, but still learn — or, in many cases, relearn — how to think outside that traditional medicine box.

This desire for personalized treatment has an additional benefit, in that it allows the patient to be in greater control of their medical treatment, rather than feeling like a passenger who’s just along for the ride.

Chronic Pain Treatments Without Opioids

The United States is in the grips of an opioid epidemic, but in spite of this, opioids remain the most common treatment for the chronic pain that affects up to 11 percent of the population. Naturopathy offers an alternative to this opioid-based treatment many patients are seeking due to a variety of reasons — either they are unable or unwilling to take opioid painkillers, or they are in recovery from an opioid addiction, but still have chronic pain to deal with in their everyday life.

Naturopathic treatments for chronic pain run the gamut from medical marijuana to diet and lifestyle changes. For example, some professionals have found a change in diet can help patients with arthritis manage their symptoms, either separate from or in conjunction with traditional medical treatments.

Patients Have Exhausted Traditional Care Options

Medical science is expansive, but for patients with chronic pain or those who suffer from chronic illness, it’s not uncommon for them to totally exhaust all available treatment options, leaving them either with the most extreme treatments or with no options at all. What can you do if modern medicine has essentially given up on you? You can apply to participate in clinical trials, but that’s not always the best option. The answer, for many, is to turn to naturopathic alternatives.

Like the arthritis example we spoke about a moment ago, naturopathic treatments can help patients manage their symptoms when they have exhausted all other options, or as something to aid in management while they wait for new treatments to complete their clinical trials.

They Fall Victim to a Scam

Not all naturopathic doctors are trained and licensed. Those who are not often prey on the fears people experience when they’re facing a serious illness like cancer. There have been multiple cases in the news, both in the United States and globally, where people with potentially treatable diagnoses turn to naturopathic medicine instead of traditional treatments — and end up dying as a result.

Now, these cases are definitely the exception, rather than the rule. Naturopathy can be an excellent option for people who have run out of options, or those who want to take more control of their health care, but it’s important to remember that while naturopathic doctors are trained and licensed, their natural remedies and treatment are not appropriate in all situations.

Whether we like it or not, naturopathy is here to stay. More and more states every year are taking steps to license naturopathic doctors, and the government’s establishment of Naturopathic Medicine Week means these treatment types are going to move out of the shadows and into the mainstream medical community.

The key to successful naturopathic treatments is to make sure patients know all their options, including transferring to a more traditional treatment plan or primary care doctor if necessary.

Patients will continue to seek out naturopathic doctors as they become more common in the coming years. While naturopathy might not offer cures for many conditions, these patient-centric treatments can help people manage their symptoms and can potentially become a fantastic complement to traditional medical practices.


Jennifer Landis is a freelance writer and healthy living blogger. She drinks tea in excess, has a collection of peanut butters, and is a super nerd at heart. Read more from Jennifer on her blog, Mindfulness Mama.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

Giving Physicians What They Need to Thrive

Doctors who do not meet the technical criteria of capability often feel that excess paperwork, weak staff, and inefficient operations make it more difficult for them to provide optimal care.

from athenahealth

Athenahealth’s research team has been studying physician capability for the past year, beginning with a survey they administered to 1,029 doctors on the athenahealth network. They rated physicians on their self-perceived capability, based on their level of agreement with two statements: (1) I have the latitude I need to provide high quality care to my patients and (2) I have the tools and resources I need to properly care for my patients.

When they correlated capability with other survey results, we found that the concept of capability provides valuable guidance for addressing some of the most pressing challenges healthcare leaders face.

Read More →

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

Hospitals, Third Parties, and Physicians: Opposing Roles in Containing Healthcare Costs

A patient’s insurance dictates which hospitals they must use, which specialists they’re allowed to see, and so on, yet physicians are expected to contain costs.

from Physician’s Weekly

Patients do not have carte blanche when it comes to decisions about their medical care. The type of insurance they have dictates which hospitals they must use, which specialists they’re allowed to see, and the type of treatments that are covered. Now more than ever, hospital and physician reimbursements are controlled by insurance companies. As a result, the pressure on physicians to contain costs and be accountable to third party payers is intense. In the process, it’s no surprise that there is a significant impact on patient care.

Read More →

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

5 Unexpected Reasons to Choose Locum Tenens

You’ve heard of locum tenens, but you may be overlooking signs that it’s right for you. Here are a five to look out for.

by Sandy Garrett, President of Jackson & Coker

“How do I know if working locum tenens is right for me?”

It’s one of the questions we get asked the most at Jackson & Coker, a healthcare staffing firm that helps physicians and advanced practitioners find locum tenens, locums-to-permanent and telehealth jobs nationwide.

In my experience working with locum tenens providers over the past few decades, I see qualities in certain people that make them great fits for locums.

Here are five signs locums is right for you:

  1. You’re mission-driven. As a mission-driven physician or advanced practitioner, you may feel confined by your physical location and unable to reach as many patients as you want. Locum tenens providers are able to serve where they are needed, whether that’s in an underserved community or in an area affected by a natural disaster or other crisis.
  2. You have student loans. We’re seeing now more than ever that young physicians and advanced practitioners are choosing locums straight out of med school. Some are choosing locums full-time, while others see it as a way to supplement their income as they pay off debt. Just one weekend of locums a month could mean thousands of extra dollars in your pocket each year.
  3. You’re ready to work less. Locums gives retiring providers the opportunity to continue to practice and help patients. But you’ll also have the flexibility for travel or spending extra time with your family.
  4. You hate paperwork. You got into medicine to treat patients, not do administrative work. Locums lets you bypass admin headaches and get back to the basics of patient care.
  5. You have wanderlust. Some people just love to travel. If your dream is to hit the road (or sky), meet new people and experience new things, locums is a great opportunity for you.

Locum tenens allows you to take control of your career and work the way you want. Visit jacksoncoker.com to get started.


Sandy Garrett is President of Jackson & Coker, one of the most well-recognized healthcare staffing firms in the United States. The firm helps physicians and advanced practitioners find locum tenens, locums-to-permanent and telehealth jobs at facilities nationwide, ensuring patients have access to life-saving care in their own communities. It has been ranked a “Best Staffing Firm to Work For” by Staffing Industry Analysts.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

Training New Doctors Right Where They’re Needed

In 2010, the Affordable Care Act created 57 teaching health centers nationwide to serve areas with large unmet medical needs, and to begin to alleviate the primary care doctor shortage.

By Ana B. Ibarra

Dr. Olga Meave didn’t mind the dry, 105-degree heat that scorched this Central Valley city on a recent afternoon.

The sweltering summer days remind her of home in Sonora, Mexico. So do the people of the Valley — especially the Latino first-generation immigrants present here in large numbers, toiling in the fields or piloting big rigs laden with fruits and vegetables.

Meave’s sense of familiarity with the region and its residents drew her to an ambitious program in Bakersfield whose goal is to train and retain doctors in medically underserved areas.

She is now in her third and final year of the Rio Bravo Family Medicine Residency Program, operated by Clinica Sierra Vista, a chain of more than 30 clinics, mostly in the Central Valley. Meave, 34, graduated from medical school in Mexico and has pursued additional education and training in the U.S.

She plans to practice in Bakersfield after she completes her residency next year.

“The goal is for [doctors in training] to come for three years and stay for 20,” said Carol Stewart, director of the program.

Rio Bravo is one of eight teaching health centers in California and 57 nationwide that were created by the Affordable Care Act in 2010 to serve areas with large unmet medical needs.

This academic year, there are 732 residents in teaching health centers across 24 states.

Unlike the Affordable Care Act itself, these teaching centers enjoy bipartisan support among federal lawmakers, who say such hubs will alleviate the primary care doctor shortage. But long-term funding is still in question. Last week, Congress agreed to temporarily finance the teaching health centers through the end of the year while debating whether to extend funding beyond that. President Donald Trump later signed the temporary extension.

A residency is a stage of graduate medical training that’s required after medical school and before doctors can set up their own practices. Most family practice residencies last three years.

Traditional residency programs are generally based at large, urban hospitals in areas where there are typically a sufficient number of doctors to go around.

The first teaching health centers began training residents in 2011. They operate primarily out of clinics in rural communities and other areas where primary care physicians are in short supply.

The ideal ratio of primary care physicians to patients is about 1 for every 2,000, Stewart said. The ratio in east Bakersfield “is more like 1 to 6,000, so we have a lot of catching up to do.”

Though teaching health centers remain relatively new, experts say they’re already succeeding: Their residents generally stay in the regions where they trained, putting down roots in communities with a big demand for health care.

In June, the Rio Bravo program graduated its first class of six doctors. Two joined the staff at a Clinica Sierra Vista clinic in east Bakersfield. The other four are practicing in clinics serving low-income communities in Sacramento, Riverside and Los Angeles counties.

Stewart estimates that the six recent graduates together saw nearly 10,000 patients during their three years of training.

“That’s a significant contribution,” she said.

Though not all teaching health centers have affiliations with medical schools, the Rio Bravo program has an academic partnership with the UCLA medical school, which helps develop its curriculum, Stewart said. It also coordinates with a local hospital, Kern Medical, where residents complete rotations in different specialties related to family medicine.

A 2015 survey by the American Association of Teaching Health Centers found that 82 percent of their graduates stay in primary care and 55 percent remain in underserved communities. By contrast, about a quarter of graduates from traditional residency programs remain in primary care and work in underserved areas, according to the same survey.

Many graduates of teaching health centers have an incentive to stay in these areas because they may qualify for other programs that offer perks, such as help with paying off medical school loans.

The centers take their patient populations into consideration when selecting applicants. For instance, Rio Bravo aims to train culturally sensitive doctors, given the large local immigrant population, Stewart said.

It looks for applicants with ties to the Valley or who come from the cultures — and speak the languages — that are familiar to patients they will serve.

Meave doesn’t have a personal connection to the Valley, but she worked with low-income patients in Mexico. She has found that the population in the Valley, and its needs, aren’t much different from those in her home country.

At Clinica Sierra Vista, she sees patients who haven’t been to a doctor in decades. “They’ve never had a physical exam, never had their eyes checked. … They just deal with their aches and pains,” she said. “I think they feel happy that I can understand them and excited that someone from the same background is providing them care.”

Teaching health centers are financed by federal grants administered by the Health Resources & Services Administration, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Congress determines the amount and duration of the funding. The current allocation, an extension of the two-year funding that expired Sept. 30, runs through the end of the year.

In July, U.S. Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.) introduced legislation that would fund the program for an additional three years at about $157,000 a year per student — a total of $116.5 million annually.

The amount proposed would be a 65 percent increase from the current funding of $95,000 a year per resident.

Lawmakers are likely to begin debating the funding measure this week, and it is still subject to change.

“I’m glad we moved forward with a short-term extension of the … program, but we also must advance a long-term solution to provide certainty for our teaching health centers, their residents, and their patients,” McMorris Rodgers said in a prepared statement. “Without a sustainable funding level … the program will unravel.”

Should that happen, California’s teaching health centers could draw from a pot of money administered by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development to pay for the remainder of the current residents’ training.

Programs in other states may not have the same safety net.

“If [federal funding] went away, our residency program would have to close,” said Dr. Darrick Nelson, director of the teaching health center at Hidalgo Medical Services in Lordsburg, N.M.

Lordsburg, with a population of roughly 2,500, is a “small railroad town,” Nelson said, and like many rural towns desperately needs versatile primary care doctors.

“What you’re getting is three doctors for the price of one,” he said. “You get someone who can do pediatrics, someone who can do obstetrical care and someone who can do internal medicine.”

In California’s Central Valley, there is no medical school, and new doctors often avoid the area in favor of richer urban centers, where they can make more money.

Earlier this year, lawmakers earmarked $465 million from the state’s new tobacco tax to boost payments for some Medi-Cal providers, which could help make poor areas like the Central Valley more attractive to doctors.

At Clinica Sierra Vista’s location in east Bakersfield, where Meave’s residency is based, 75 percent of patients are covered by Medi-Cal — the state’s version of the federal Medicaid program for low-income residents — and 15 percent are uninsured, Stewart said. Asthma, diabetes and other chronic conditions are major health problems.

Veronica Ayon, a former farmworker, is one of Meave’s patients. Like her doctor, she is a native of Sonora.

Ayon, 48, was treated for cervical cancer in 2010 and last year underwent surgery to remove a malignant brain tumor. She feels comfortable with Meave because of their similar backgrounds and language, she said.

“She is very special to me,” Ayon said, speaking in Spanish inside her home in the town of Shafter, about 20 miles north of Bakersfield. “She explains things at a level I can understand.”


This story was produced by Kaiser Health News, which publishes California Healthline, an editorially independent service of the California Health Care Foundation.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

The Necessity of Continuing the Advancement of Clinical Trials

Despite vast patient benefits, clinical trials have struggled to recruit their target number of participants, with many recent studies failing to reach 33 percent of their original recruitment goal.

by Jennifer Landis

Clinical trials offer patients the opportunity to contribute to the development and approval of new therapies, drugs, treatments and medical devices. This research has the potential to improve the participating patient’s quality of life. In fact, recent advancements in the health care field over the past few decades can be attributed to clinical trial testing.

The vast patient benefits of participating in clinical trials include contributing to new research, access to the latest medical developments and positive effects on patient well-being. Despite this, clinical trials have struggled to recruit their target number of participants, with many recent studies failing to reach 33 percent of their original recruitment goal.

Patients decline to participate in clinical trials due to personal inconvenience and concerns with protocol, including using treatment methods unapproved by the FDA and conflicts with the research process. The development of programs that are focused more on patients rather than on statistical outcomes could increase the success of future programs.

Program Improvements

Clinical trials aren’t without fault. Improper reporting, misinterpreted outcomes, misleading reports and lost data are several of the items that skew trial results and occasionally render them unusable. Researchers can minimize these pitfalls by paying careful attention to detail, performing objective data analysis and reporting all trial results.

To encourage additional patient participation, trial administrators can work to develop programs specific to the outcomes relevant to patients in addition to clinician-reported outcomes. In the past, outcomes important to patients, such as death or outcomes, were considered to be of little value to completed studies or not reported at all.

Patient outcomes of interest include life expectancy, how they feel and how they function on a daily basis. Studies that share these metrics, as well as the symptoms and side effects experienced by participants, will garner more interest and be of more value to individuals suffering from the disease.

For successful trials to continue, qualified patients of all ages and backgrounds need to participate. A diverse trial group stands the best chance at representing the population that will be using the tested treatment options or devices.

Reduce Failure Rates

Approximately 50 percent of Phase III clinical trials fail by not exhibiting effective treatment outcomes, having severe or unexpected side effects or by not proving to be financially beneficial. Nearly 70 percent of Phase II clinical trials fail, though this is expected as these trials are in a more preliminary stage.

Patients who participate in Phase III trials are typically in late-stage conditions. These patients may have exhausted other treatments or have limited time available to find a successful option. Failed trials put them at risk for emotional distress and decreased quality of life.

The failure rate for Phase III trials can be reduced by defining specific protocol earlier on in the testing process, before beginning Phase II trials. A clear path forward during testing will reduce the number of treatment options that move to Phase III trials. This may increase the success rate of clinical trials and increase patient interest and involvement.

Future Possibilities

Remote clinical trials offer patients and clinicians a flexible option for participating in and conducting new research. Patients living in rural communities or patients that have difficulty commuting to a research facility have the option of participating in studies that otherwise might not have been available to them. Remote trials can solve the problem of patient participation as a larger audience can be reached.

Clinicians can ensure the integrity of trials by directing patients to one central location where specific protocols can be followed. Researchers can then work together to analyze and track the patient data being provided in one area. This reduces the potential for lost data or information being left out of analysis.

New apps have been developed that enable communications between patients and physicians directly. Patients can also track and record their progress through these apps and share this information with physicians through the app. This lessens the financial burden on patients as the number of visits to the clinical trial center and travel costs are reduced.

Registered reports are a new method to ensure clinical trial information is shared regardless of the outcome. In the first stage, the clinical trial process is peer-reviewed and sent back for revisions, if necessary. Once the protocol is accepted, the journal agrees to publish the results of the study regardless of the outcomes. This removes pressure for clinicians to leave out negative results and promotes trust among participants, since reviewed and defined processes will be followed.

Clinical trials are necessary to continue to make advancements in medical treatments. Reviewed, established protocol before beginning trials can ensure a higher success rate. This, along with a more patient-centric approach and remote trial options, can increase the number of participants.


Jennifer Landis is a freelance writer and healthy living blogger. She drinks tea in excess, has a collection of peanut butters, and is a super nerd at heart. Read more from Jennifer on her blog, Mindfulness Mama.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

PAs, NPs, and Physicians Deliver Comparable Patient Care

Across the outcomes studied, results suggest that NP/PA care was largely comparable to PCP care in community health centers.

A recently published study in the journal Medical Care, researching patient care outcomes in community health centers, has found that physician assistants and nurse practitioners deliver comparable care, services, and referrals to those of primary care physicians.

Using data collected between 2006 and 2010, including the analysis of 23,704 patient visits to 1139 practitioners, researchers at The George Washington University School of Nursing found seven of the nine outcomes studied showed there was no statistically significant difference between PA/NP and PCP provided care. The two remaining outcomes studied showed that visits to PAs and NPs provided patients with more health education/counseling services than visits to physicians.

These findings should serve to reassure patients who see PAs and NPs in community health centers, the numbers of which have grown significantly due to the Affordable Care Act.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

What is Driving Physicians to Burnout

Many doctors are always a step away from burnout. But we all chose this profession anyway, because we want to make a difference.

from Dr. Linda

Burnout rates are escalating among physicians, as well as other healthcare workers. In a system that is already stressed by many forces, losing any member of the team can have devastating consequences. Nurses are a prime example of how they are expected to do more and more work with less and less help and resources. Hospitals cut back on their ranks to save money. And patients suffer because of it. Big organizations do not so much care about the health of these nurses who selflessly try to give patients their best. Rather, the bottom line dictates staffing standards.

Read More →

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

In Patient Satisfaction Scores, What Role Does Bias Play?

Do physicians who are not white or male get graded worse by patients?

from AMA Wire

Women and minority physicians continue to face prejudice in the workplace, which is a potential barrier to career advancement, fulfillment and leadership opportunities. Such stressors can also discourage women from continuing in academic medical practice. Yet no experimental studies isolate the direct effect that physician gender and race can have on patient satisfaction ratings. Do physicians who are not white or male get graded worse by patients?

Read More →

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.