Steal this Recruiter’s Tips to Land the Perfect Job

Seeking a competitive advantage to help you land your perfect job? Look no further than this advice from a clinician who has been involved in hiring.

By Jordan G Roberts, PA-C

No matter your profession, job searching can be hard. On top of the everyday challenges, the internet has no shortage of advice with questionable authority.

There are entire blogs written by human resources professionals filled with tips and insights they say will help you land any job. However, they don’t fully address the unique needs of a clinician’s job search.

When it comes to hiring healthcare professionals, employers have the advantage of hiring consultants if necessary. Where can clinicians turn when they need a new job?

Recruiters and healthcare-specific job boards like HealthJobsNationwide.com are one source. They can tell you what characteristics clients are seeking for certain positions, which is great.

Another strategy is to obtain insider tips. In today’s article, we have tips and advice from one of the premier sources for hiring PA’s and NP’s. Renee Dahring, FNP is a former owner of a clinician staffing agency and current correctional healthcare NP.

One of the best places you can find job search advice and strategies is a clinician who has been involved in the hiring process. This article expands on my interview with NP Dahring from the Clinician1 podcast.

Read the article and get the competitive advantage that will help you land your perfect job by clicking here. Once you’ve soaked it all up, come back to HealthJobsNationwide.com to put your new skills in action.


Jordan G Roberts, PA-C helps medical education companies create and distribute the best medical education around. He helps students and clinicians improve their clinical game by using his background in neuroscience to teach simple ways to learn complex medical topics. He is a published researcher, national speaker, and medical writer. He can be found at Modern MedEd where he promotes clinical updates, medical writing, and medical education.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

Using Medical Survey Panels to Grow Your Clinical Income

Explore the benefits, as well as the downsides, of participating in medical market research survey panels as a way to supplement your income.

By Jordan G Roberts, PA-C

Taking medical surveys online seems like the ideal way to supplement your clinical income. The ability to work from home is very attractive, not to mention the freedom to participate only when you want. Plus, these surveys cover new developments in your area of expertise, so they don’t require a lot of extra brain-power.

In addition to showing you the seven best medical survey panels for clinicians, we will look into the benefits, as well as the downsides, of participating in these panels. I guess there really is nothing in this life that doesn’t have a catch.

Reasons NOT to join:

  • Uncertainty: You’ll never really know how much you’ll make from these panels. The volume of requests you’ll receive depends on the needs of the client and your own specialty and years of experience. They certainly won’t be replacing your full-time clinical income anytime soon
  • Taxes: You are responsible for your own taxes here, just like with any independent contractor set-up. For some, the supplemental income is not worth the headache at tax time.

Reasons to join:

  • Supplemental income: This is self-explanatory. It’s the reason you are here reading this article.
  • Shape the direction of industry: This is the lesser-known benefit of these panels. These companies are asking for your help and insight. Sure, they’ll use it to try to make a profit, but that’s why they are paying you for your service. Why not help out by pointing them in the right direction from the start?

Where can you sign up?

Read the entire article here to find links to the specific panels and join today.


Jordan G Roberts, PA-C helps medical education companies create and distribute the best medical education around. He helps students and clinicians improve their clinical game by using his background in neuroscience to teach simple ways to learn complex medical topics. He is a published researcher, national speaker, and medical writer. He can be found at Modern MedEd where he promotes clinical updates, medical writing, and medical education.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

44 Million Reasons to Expand Scope of Practice

13% of the population of the U.S. now lives in a county that is experiencing a primary care physician shortage. Advanced practitioners could very well be the answer.

Forty-four million Americans, or 13% of the total population, now live in a county in the United States that is undergoing a primary care physician shortage, according to a new report from UnitedHealth Group, one of the nation’s largest insurers.

When considering the findings of the report, entitled Addressing the Nation’s Primary Care Shortage: Advanced Practice Clinicians and Innovative Care Delivery Models, expanding scope of practice laws in the 28 states still restricting NPs from full practice authority is one clear answer to the shortage, which is only expected to get worse over time.

As cited in the report, the U.S. population is expected to increase 8%, from 328 million to 355 million, by 2030. Meanwhile, the number of primary care physicians is expected to only increase 6% from 288,000 to 306,000 by 2025, leaving a significant gap in care that could be filled by the scores of NPs practicing primary care, which will increase 47% from 204,000 to 299,000 during the same time.

By removing barriers to practice and allowing NPs to practice at the full capacity of their training and education, the report finds that the number of U.S. residents living in a county with a primary care shortage would decline 70%, from 44 million to less than 13 million.

To read the full findings of the report, please click here.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

Tired of Peer-to-Peer Phone Calls with the Insurance Company?

There are techniques and processes you can develop to make your life easier when dealing with the oft-labeled “bureaucratic nightmare” of insurance companies.

By Jordan G Roberts, PA-C

Optimize Your Clinical Efficiency and Spend Less Time on the Phone with Utilization Review

Love them or hate them, insurance companies are a major part of life for healthcare providers. You may feel that they are intentionally making your life more difficult, but the truth is that every move they make has been carefully considered to increase their chances of achieving favorable business outcomes.

This may not be too comforting; it may, in fact, be more irksome to some. But knowing how and why bureaucracy has influenced healthcare can help you do something about it. It may help you think more clearly when you feel that you or your patient has been personally targeted by a denial letter.

Of course, we know that many plans are following pre-approved guidelines that dictate whether or not they’ll pay for a study or lab test you’ve ordered. And most of the time, claims that are initially denies are reversed with just a little more clinical information.

Therefore, there are techniques and processes you can develop to make your life easier in this respect. The first part is optimizing your clinical documentation so that you can avoid this time-intensive problem altogether.

If – or when – a denial rears its dreadful face sheet on your fax machine, despite your best efforts, you have another option. This is the successful utilization review, otherwise known as the ‘peer-to-peer.’ If you aren’t winning the vast majority of these, or if you find yourself doing more of these than you’d like, this article is for you.

Read More →


Jordan G Roberts, PA-C helps medical education companies create and distribute the best medical education around. He helps students and clinicians improve their clinical game by using his background in neuroscience to teach simple ways to learn complex medical topics. He is a published researcher, national speaker, and medical writer. He can be found at Modern MedEd where he promotes clinical updates, medical writing, and medical education.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

Advanced Practitioners Contribute Greatly to Cancer Care

The first large-scale study of NPs and PAs in oncology shows that not only are advanced practitioners directly involved in patient care, but they also like their jobs.

A study published last month in the Journal of Oncology Practice explored the responsibilities of advanced practitioners in oncology and found that their role has grown significantly, just as a 2007 study published in the same journal predicted it would.

The study, which is the first large-scale study of Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants in oncology, aimed to not only identify all oncology advanced practitioners, but to also understand their personal and practice characteristics, including compensation.

The researchers identified at least 5,350 advanced practice providers involved in oncology care, and an additional 5,400 NPs and PAs who might practice oncology. They then attempted to survey 3,055 of those advanced practice providers about their roles in clinical care, though respondents yielded only a 19% response rate.

Of the NPs and PAs that responded to the survey, it was found that more than 90% reported satisfaction with career choice, and 80% were directly involved in patient care, such as patient counseling, prescribing, treatment management, and follow-up visits. It was also reported that the average annual compensation for oncology advanced practitioners was between $113,000 and $115,000, which is approximately $10,000 more than the average pay for non-oncology advanced practitioners.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

Best Non-Clinical Side Hustles Any Clinician Can Start – Part 2

Part two of this series explores the non-clinical options of landing clinical speaking opportunities or joining paid medical market research panels.

By Jordan G Roberts, PA-C

Welcome back to our series on non-clinical careers for healthcare professionals. In part I, we discussed opportunities to start teaching in non-traditional ways and how to get into medical writing.

Today’s post will expand on this topic. First, we’ll show you how you can land clinical speaking opportunities. Next, you will learn about how to join paid medical market research panels to supplement your income and shape the direction of industry.

Speaking

It turns out that not many of us like the sound of our own voice. Even fewer people jump at the prospect at getting in front of a large crowd. That’s unfortunate, because your colleagues really do want to hear what you have to say.

The good news is that you can reach your fellow clinicians in a variety of ways, with or without a podium and a lectern.

While speaking at conferences is generally the first thing that comes to mind, it’s generally labor-intensive to get started. You not only need a great presentation, but you will also have to plan, apply for, and be selected for the spot. Therefore, this rigorous process makes it a prestigious, if not occasional option.

Other avenues take advantage of technology and the information boom. Medical podcasts and videos online are becoming more popular and starting to catch up with other social media trends. There are podcasts specific to certain groups of clinicians, podcasts for CME, and even specialty-specific podcasts. What will yours be?

Of course, one of the most lucrative ways to speak is for industry. Key opinion leaders (KOLs) give promotional talks for products they use and find to be the most beneficial for their patients. Teaching others about what you already use is a great way to get into this line of work.

Medical Market Research Panels

There are several companies who license their pool of clinicians to their clients who are developing a new healthcare product or service. The best ones pay cash honorariums that are worth your hourly rate. You also help shape the direction of these companies by providing your expertise and experience for these companies to consider in their future strategy.

Learn the skills and get the resources you need to get started in the original article. Continue reading the second of our three-part series on non-clinical opportunities here


Jordan G Roberts, PA-C helps medical education companies create and distribute the best medical education around. He helps students and clinicians improve their clinical game by using his background in neuroscience to teach simple ways to learn complex medical topics. He is a published researcher, national speaker, and medical writer. He can be found at Modern MedEd where he promotes clinical updates, medical writing, and medical education.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

Kim’s Blog: Stand Up and Support Patients’ Wishes

What effort does it take to support a patient’s wishes? It’s not merely documenting them, but putting the wheels into motion to do, or to NOT do things.

by Kimberly Spering, MSN, FNP-BC

What effort does it take to support a patient or family’s wishes? It’s often not merely documenting those wishes, but putting the wheels into motion to do, or to NOT do things.

I received a request from my staff the other day to open a palliative care case – a new patient, on a Friday. Typically, I like my new patients to be earlier in the week, as those visits can last for hours, and, quite frankly, I like to be done at a reasonable hour prior to the start of my weekend, rather than chart until 8 – 9 PM.

“We think she may need hospice support. It’s not urgent, of course,” I was told.

I reviewed the patient’s chart. A nonagenarian at almost 91 years old, she had dementia, which unfortunately worsened after a CVA several years ago. She had been a fully independent, active person until she fell and suffered pelvic fractures almost two months ago. She went to rehabilitation, came home, then was found lethargic with a low SpO2 in the 70s. She returned to the hospital and was diagnosed with bilateral pulmonary emboli. She was started on anti-coagulation, which was quickly stopped due to GI bleeding. An IVC filter was placed. The GI specialists felt she was too frail and declined any invasive evaluation of the bleeding. Our palliative care inpatient team saw her and discussed hospice, but the son was not ready to make that decision.

Due to concerns about her care with the nursing home with her first rehabilitation stay, her son requested that she come home, where she has had 16 hours/day of aide support.

I arrived to find her son on the phone with her PCP’s office. Her hemoglobin had decreased from 11.8 to 10.2 in several days, so the PCP recommended ED evaluation.

Three days ago, however, she had presented to the ED for black, tarry stools (which continued after anti-coagulation was stopped). Her hemoglobin was stable, so she was discharged home.

Her son was irate, because it took hours for an ambulance transport to bring her home (at 1:30 AM), and when she got there, she was full of feces that hadn’t been cleaned up.

So, when the PCP office called today, saying, “take her back to the ED,” he was less than willing to do so.

I spoke with the office staff during that call, telling them I was there to evaluate her, and we would see how she was.

I started the conversation by reviewing her hospital stays, then led this into discussion of their goals of care.

“I don’t want her to go back to the hospital,” he first said. “I want to keep her at home and care for her here.”

After much discussion of hospice support, he admitted that he wasn’t ready for hospice, as he wanted to keep checking her CBC and have her get blood if needed. At the same time, he declined an EGD and colonoscopy, and he really did not want her to go back to the hospital, although he “would if it was needed.”

We discussed her decreased Hgb level, as well as his wishes for further care. Because he wanted the option to return to the hospital, getting blood if needed, she would not be appropriate for hospice anyway.

I gently explained my worries that with a continued slow GI bleed, that she eventually would become hypoxic and more lethargic, but unfortunately, with her current Hgb of 10.2, likely the hospital would NOT transfuse her at this point. In fact, the hospitalist previously documented transfusions only if her Hgb was < 7.5. Going to the ED would not be beneficial today, given that her vitals were stable, she was not SOB, and did not appear toxic.

Her son was relieved after this discussion. He has his own significant health issues, and in fact had an appointment today. We reviewed danger signs – increased dyspnea, lower SpO2, increased lethargy/weakness, increased black stools, etc.

I made another phone call to the PCP office and also messaged the patient’s PCP about the symptoms, evaluation, and son’s preference for repeat labs in a few days. As of this blog, I have not heard back.

What was important was to advocate for the patient and son. Had she seemed toxic or decompensated, given that he wanted labs and blood, I would have reiterated the need for ED evaluation.

Looking at the bigger picture, however, brought up a few points:

  • GI did not want to perform invasive testing.
  • Her Hgb was stable and not at a level to warrant transfusion.
  • The son’s goal is to keep her at home and minimize any invasive testing or hospitalization.

So, can one simply look at a hemoglobin level and recommend ED evaluation?

Really, it’s an individual decision, based on individual factors. Not simply a hemoglobin level. I imagine that the ED staff would roll their eyes having a patient with this hemoglobin roll in, particularly since parameters were clearly set only days ago.

So, once again – it points out that we need to advocate for our patients, explain their diagnoses, treatment options, risks, and benefits. Discussing their goals of care is essential. Do the possibilities of treatment coincide with their goals? Are we simply chasing “numbers,” rather than looking at the whole picture?

I get it, from my palliative perspective, it’s all about quality of life. Function. Comfort. Goals of care.

In this case, however, I think her goals are clear. Minimize hospitalizations if possible, but still check labs and transfuse if needed. There will be more discussions of her goals at my next visit. This is an on-going conversation, not a once-and-done deal.

Think about discussing your patients’ goals of care, whether or not they currently face life-limiting illness. It may only occur during an annual wellness visit. It may occur after a significant health crisis. But please, discuss it. You may be the only person willing to do so.

Wouldn’t we all want the same? Think about it.


Kim Spering has been a nurse for over 25 years and worked as an NP over the past 15 years in Family Medicine, Women’s Health, Internal Medicine, and now Palliative Medicine. She serves as an editorial board member of Clinician 1 and submit blogs to the website, with a goal of highlighting both the clinician and patient experience in health care.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

Best Non-Clinical Side Hustles Any Clinician Can Start (Without Quitting their Day Job) – Part 1

There are more opportunities than ever for clinicians to engage in meaningful non-clinical work. Here are some options.

By Jordan G Roberts, PA-C

Clinicians are generally type A personalities with incredible ambition and drive to help others. As such, it’s not uncommon for healthcare professionals to have more than one job at a time.

Some do it for the love of the work and some do it to dig out from under their mountain of student loan debt. There are as many reasons as there are clinicians, and they’re all good.

However, sometimes clinicians look forward to more clinical work like patients look forward to endoscopies. It’s clear that not everyone who seeks a part-time opportunity wants to see more patients.

Fortunately, there are more opportunities than ever for clinicians to engage in meaningful non-clinical work.

Whether your goal is to transition out of clinical practice entirely or pick up some extra work when you have time, this article can help. We’ll cover two non-clinical opportunities that are worth your time and effort in each post.

Today’s article will cover teaching (but not in the way you think) and writing.

While academia is technically non-clinical, and yes, part-time positions are available, it’s not a new idea. We are living in a digital age with new ways to reach an audience. We’ll show you a few innovative ways you can use your expertise to help more people than you ever thought possible.

Next, we’ll explore the myriad opportunities available to clinicians in medical communications, specifically, in medical writing. Your skills as a subject matter expert are worth a premium on the open market, so if you can also write well, you are a valuable commodity.

Learn the skills and get the resources you need to get started in the original article. Continue reading the first of our three-part series on non-clinical opportunities here.


Jordan G Roberts, PA-C helps medical education companies create and distribute the best medical education around. He helps students and clinicians improve their clinical game by using his background in neuroscience to teach simple ways to learn complex medical topics. He is a published researcher, national speaker, and medical writer. He can be found at Modern MedEd where he promotes clinical updates, medical writing, and medical education.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

NP Salaries on the Rise

A new survey by the AANP has found that the total mean income for NPs was more than $112k in 2017.

As both the demand for and number of Nurse Practitioners only continue to grow, it appears that NP salaries are rising proportionately, according the AANP’s 2017 National Nurse Practitioner Sample Survey results.

The results of the survey, released earlier this month, found that in 2017, full-time NPs, regardless of their certification, are now receiving an average hourly wage of just under $59.87, and the base salary for full-time NPs was, on average, $105,546, with the total mean income for full-time NPs clocking in at $112,923.

Broken down by specialty, it was found that Adult Mental Health NPs, which only account for 1.7% of all NPs, received the highest base salary, while Emergency NPs had the highest hourly wage and total income. It was also reported that, between 2015 and 2017, the base salaries for Geriatric NPs and Family NPs also increased, up 30% and 18%, respectively.

The full 2017 National Nurse Practitioner Sample Survey Report is a free resource for AANP members and can be accessed by clicking here.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

PA Salaries Increase, Top $100k on Average

The average annual PA salary increased nearly 3%, compared to the previous year, with a majority of PAs now earning a base salary of more than $100,000.

A new report from the AAPA released this month finds that the average annual physician assistant salary increased 2.9% compared to the previous year, with full time, salaried PAs (78.7% of the profession) now making, on average, over $100,000 annually. The report also found that PAs who are employed in a hospital setting are earning higher salaries, securing more leadership positions, and receiving better benefits than their counterparts employed by physician practices.

The 2018 AAPA Salary Report, which collected responses from 9,140 PAs, finds that while both hospital-based PAs and those employed by physician practices enjoy healthy salaries, leadership opportunities, and benefits, those in a hospital setting are earning more (base salaries of $107,000 versus $101,000 on average in 2017), hold more formal leadership positions (57.5% versus 28.2%), and typically receive more paid time off (20.0 versus 17.8 days of general PTO, 8.4 versus 5.0 days of sick PTO) than those based in physician practices. These two types of PAs account for 81% of all PAs, with physician practice-based PAs making up the largest group of the profession (46.1% of PAs), and hospital-based PAs trailing closely behind as the second largest group (34.9% of PAs).

As reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the PA profession is projected to increase 37% from 2016 to 2026, which is well above the average for all occupations. These findings by the BLS, as well as the new AAPA report, indicate that as more and more barriers to PA practice are removed and the demand for non-physician providers grows, PAs can likely expect their employment opportunities, as well as their salaries, to continue to increase.

Disclaimer: The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.